Anjaane

Every Professional situation is like an art exhibition. The walls are often the focus of ones attention in such a place. No one is really interested in staying in there for any other reason except for finding the exit in psychological senses. The walls and the works of art form the perfect circle for freedom within confines. A reflection of the entire civilization where the calculated amount of freedom is bestowed upon a population.

The walls also contain windows and doors to the real world but often people ignore them and concentrate on the patches of the wall were the clever use of chemicals causes the areas of canvas to selectively reflect a frequency of light creating an illusion of reality and/or familiarity.

The success of an art exhibition is in its ability to keep people from looking at doors and windows for as long as possible. Same is the situation for a workplace were the comfort,music, humor and sophistication is a means of keeping people in the office as long as possible. The freedoms are limited to a chosen group of pictures on the wall. The painting exhibit of Michelangelo is'int representative of him rather it is a decision of the organizers.

Billy

Tomorrow comes ; Sorrow becomes his soul mate --The damage is done : the prodigal son is too late.

I think that People are guided by a deep urge to identify ones thoughts in reality. One of the main reason people like to read horoscopes. I think more than any thing is is a set of lines where a person wishes he reads about his rationality for defending his actions.

Though the accepted fact is that world is not guided for deserving rather its guided by irrationality of probability . Its easy to accept that logic can alter probability but that rule applies for only a definite aspect of probability. That is logic is not defined by rationality though rationality is an component of Logic. Logic is better defined by choice of outcome. The outcome is what satisfies the Id and superego so the rationality for the choice of target to satisfy.

my 'Theme for a Dream'

My extensive efforts towards introspection have yielded a bunch of conclusions that I am willing to defend.
A dream consists of waste memories that are shuffling around in the brain and the story thus formed is an indication of subconscious flow of thoughts that should have resulted, if the conscious influences and sensory stimuli were removed.
A dream commonly incorporates any sensory stimulus that the sleeping person is subjected too, much like any perception is absorbed into the ongoing story. Hence supporting the argument that dreams can be modulated and are direct reflection of subconscious and persons surrounding.
Dreamer can do many things in a dream but mostly it consists things he has planned/longed for or the thoughts he consciously chooses to ignore during waking hours.
The physics of reality followed very strictly. A person can not do anything even if he was conscious of being dreaming, any idea of manipulation is not acceptable and is often subjected to strong inertia.
A person is most often a silent observer. A person can say things but can not create sound I think a person only speaks in his mind even though he can definitely hear others with mouth movement. Some times light sleep ideas are converted to movements.
He can never see himself in a dream, and faces are very obscure. Most of the times the idea of a person is thew only true conclusion, persons outfit etc are also very undefined. A person never really can see of sense his feet movements the idea is more like floating at the normal walking speed at the ground level.
A person never does anything that is physically painful in a dream like working out or jogging
A person can voluntarily start a dream based upon the immediately previous thoughts but can never control the outcome.
Dream is a virtual memory that includes bits and pieces considered irrelevant for conscious analysis. It can never go backwards in time even if the sleeper is conscious about dreaming.
The novelty of thoughts in a dreams is in its perception and not the information itself.
A person can only see the things he has actually seen and imagination of information is more of a concious effort, dreams can only appreciate recombinations of information already available.

Half the man I used to be

Perspective of reality is a pseudo science like psychology; as the opinion and manner of affirmation greatly change the consequences in philosophy not in physics. My argument here is on the aspect of knowing the right or wrong in oneself.

Everyone in the world shall under normal circumstances shall easily categorize itself as a "normal" which is a arbitrary frame of reference made for most people to be mutually compatible.

The knowledge of ones shortcoming has dual influences on a persons responses. The actions are further guided to protect the identity as a 'defective' and to develop other mechanism to compensate for the deficiency.

Thus the world has two kind of people normal and not so normal. The self recognition of being abnormal by the host categorizes it as a 'neurotic' if not he is a 'psychotic'.

As previously stated the right and wrong are guided by popular social acceptance, and most often a persons affinity to popular stuff is guided its intention to belong to the larger group. The other bunch of people categorized by the popular as the 'others' are the ones that oppose the popular. For example communist ideas might be considered neurotic in US same way as democratic idea is considered in China.

Thus every society has only two types of people; either 'psychotic' or 'neurotic' i.e. two groups of people one that knows that it is crazy and the other that does not (yet).