Women never love men they only have a list of few whom they trust.
the reasoning is probably simple and genetic in nature.
All human experiences are an exaggeration and sophistication of a habit found in Lower animals and so is love Females always pick the best possible of the available males [both 'availability' and 'best' features are critically important].
All human experiences are an exaggeration and sophistication of a habit found in Lower animals and so is love Females always pick the best possible of the available males [both 'availability' and 'best' features are critically important].
Women like to be in a state of freedom within a state of constant comfortable surrounding provided by the male and guarded by him. The Male's role in society is only that and shall always be a refined form of the one seen in lower animals.
A males have a feeling of belonging, territory, ownership and have well defined relationships with his friends and foes to defend his territory.
women on the contrary utilise males for most of the above .
'Belonging to a state in society' shall evolve to the feeling of love in later mammals.
Ownership , and territory are the features that are classical qualities of a male that supposedly females look for and take refuge in . This might not be money in all times but just a social ownership and social territory in many situations.
The choice in males is lesser well defined and is more obscure like love.
I don't mean to say that women don't love men but they admire other qualities more deeply and love of course helps them to keep the definition right.
Over reliance on love in a relationship is a scary thought for women and probably the most sought for in men.
Love in theory has no needs no reasoning like between mother and son and the one seen between siblings, none has to to do with reasoning. Its classical definition is devoid of all the criterion followed by the extra X population. The unexplainability of love is the one that explains it the most. The undefinability is the best adjective it can have.
Love in theory has no needs no reasoning like between mother and son and the one seen between siblings, none has to to do with reasoning. Its classical definition is devoid of all the criterion followed by the extra X population. The unexplainability of love is the one that explains it the most. The undefinability is the best adjective it can have.
I think a woman only loves her children and and till the time she gets any she has her family to fill in. the man's place comes only when the instincts get obscure.
A person be it male or female can have an opinion about an issue that can range any where on the spectrum with the limits from totally masculine to feminine. Thus i think there is no true female or male mind. There only are feminine and masculine opinion to a situation and these are the qualities that make people different from each other; i.e. a person can have feminine opinion on love and masculine opinion on clothing and so on.
[i think the above argument explains 85-95% of individuals]
No comments:
Post a Comment